1997
DOI: 10.1109/8.575651
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the optimal design of the PML absorbing boundary condition for the FDTD code

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Utah group used the ®nite difference time domain method (FDTD) at 10 MHz and scaled the results to 60 Hz [Gandhi and Chen, 1992;Furse and Gandhi, 1998]. The computational space was terminated by an 8-layer perfectly matched layer (PML) introduced by Berenger [1994] and optimized as described by Lazzi and Gandhi [1997], or by the retarded time boundary condition [Berntsen and Hornsleth, 1994]. The magnitude and phase of the ®elds in each location were noted at two time instances (100 steps apart).…”
Section: Computational Methods For the Electric Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Utah group used the ®nite difference time domain method (FDTD) at 10 MHz and scaled the results to 60 Hz [Gandhi and Chen, 1992;Furse and Gandhi, 1998]. The computational space was terminated by an 8-layer perfectly matched layer (PML) introduced by Berenger [1994] and optimized as described by Lazzi and Gandhi [1997], or by the retarded time boundary condition [Berntsen and Hornsleth, 1994]. The magnitude and phase of the ®elds in each location were noted at two time instances (100 steps apart).…”
Section: Computational Methods For the Electric Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the increment of time steps, the curves obtained by unconditionally stable algorithms shows significant shifting, as shown in Figure 5B, Figure 6B introduced with CFLN = 16. The relative error is defined in 32 which can efficiently demonstrate the calculation error in the frequency domain. Figure 7 shows the relative error in the frequency domain including S 11 parameter in Figure 7A and S 21 parameter in Figure 7B.…”
Section: Save Components and Results For Next Cyclementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [7], Lazzi and Gandhi utilize a "pseudoanalytical" formula in optimal design of the PML. However, polynomial profile is again presumed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%