Proceedings of the 4th ACM International Workshop on Video Surveillance and Sensor Networks 2006
DOI: 10.1145/1178782.1178800
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the optimal placement of multiple visual sensors

Abstract: Many novel multimedia systems and applications use visual sensor arrays. An important issue in designing sensor arrays is the appropriate placement of the visual sensors such that they achieve a predefined goal. In this paper we focus on the placement with respect to maximizing coverage or achieving coverage at a certain resolution. We identify and consider four different problems: maximizing coverage subject to a given number of cameras (a) or a maximum total price of the sensor array (b), optimizing camera p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As observed in [7], multimedia sensor networks enhance traditional surveillance systems by enlarging, enhancing, and enabling multi-resolution views. The investigation of coverage problems for static visual sensor networks is conducted in [5] [13].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As observed in [7], multimedia sensor networks enhance traditional surveillance systems by enlarging, enhancing, and enabling multi-resolution views. The investigation of coverage problems for static visual sensor networks is conducted in [5] [13].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The angular view or field of view (FoV) and limited range for each guard, however, makes the area coverage problem with cameras more complex. Even after discretization of space and camera poses, potential solutions remain unscalable [63]. Therefore, a number of heuristics using angular sweeping for camera pans have been proposed, which proved to have performance close to optimal, although still require high computational complexity.…”
Section: ) Fixed Deploymentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distribution and optimization of camera network is also known as camera network deployment (Debaque, Jedidi, and Prevost 2009), placement (Zhao et al 2011;Hörster and Lienhart 2006), coverage-enhancing (Ma, Zhang, and Ming 2009) and planning (Zhao and Cheung 2009). The most common goal for camera network deployment optimization problem is to meet the coverage requirements with the least number of cameras.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%