2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2018.11.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the optimization of the support vector machine regression hyperparameters setting for gas sensors array applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
6

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
26
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…49,50 The SVR regression performance is associated with the proper selection of the parameters, which are 3, C, and g. The value of the 3 is related directly to the number of support vectors. 51 The value of g is determined by the width of the bellshaped curves in the structure of the SVM regression with a Gaussian function (as shown in eqn (7)). In this research, the polynomial kernel function was found to be more accurate than the Gaussian function; therefore, we did not achieve the value of g. On the other hand, the value of C allows the SVM to gain more simple curves as the goal accuracy is obtained.…”
Section: Prediction Performance Of Svmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…49,50 The SVR regression performance is associated with the proper selection of the parameters, which are 3, C, and g. The value of the 3 is related directly to the number of support vectors. 51 The value of g is determined by the width of the bellshaped curves in the structure of the SVM regression with a Gaussian function (as shown in eqn (7)). In this research, the polynomial kernel function was found to be more accurate than the Gaussian function; therefore, we did not achieve the value of g. On the other hand, the value of C allows the SVM to gain more simple curves as the goal accuracy is obtained.…”
Section: Prediction Performance Of Svmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work of [19] shows that the root mean square error of the SVM varies more sharply with the σ parameter than with the C parameter. Our previous study [8] also shows that the σ parameter is much more sensitive than the γ parameter of the LS-SVM.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With a large dataset, parameter tuning could become too expensive to be practical for an office PC due to long computing time and lack of prior knowledge of the parameters. Several alternative methods have been proposed to speed up the search [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. However, they were tested either with only toy examples or with real world data of a few hundreds to a few thousands of samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance of nonlinear SVR is highly dependent on the selection of hyperparameters (e.g., ϵ, C, and σ for RBF-based SVR) [32][33][34]. Careful tuning of these parameters is essential for improving the performance of the SVR model.…”
Section: Implementation Of Optimization In Svr Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%