2003
DOI: 10.1086/381222
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Origin of the Basal Emission from Stellar Atmospheres: Analysis of Solar CiiLines

Abstract: Combining a variety of data with radiation hydrodynamic simulations, we examine the heating of the Sun's internetwork chromosphere and the hypothesis that the chromospheric '' basal '' emission arises because of acoustic wave dissipation. We focus on the 2s 2p 2 2 D 2s 2 2p 2 P o multiplet of C ii near 1335 Å , whose basal level of chromospheric emission has been reliably determined for stars and the Sun by Schrijver and colleagues. By accounting for center-to-limb variations and the different spectral bandpas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
40
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
7
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is possible that wave motions driven from the photosphere would increase in amplitude and develop into strong shocks as they propagate upward. The observations do not confirm the existence of shocks that can provide enough heating to explain radiative losses of the upper chromosphere (e.g., Judge et al 2003 andFossum &Carlson 2006), although some heating of the low chromosphere appears possible from the numerical simulations. However, motions in the low chromosphere with velocities compatible with the observed line broadening or shift (which is usually not more than $1Y2 km s À1 in lines formed near the temperature minimum) cannot completely explain the observed extension of the CO line emission above the solar limb for about 5 scale heights (Ayres & Rabin 1996).…”
Section: Density Stratification and The Chromosphere Heightmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…It is possible that wave motions driven from the photosphere would increase in amplitude and develop into strong shocks as they propagate upward. The observations do not confirm the existence of shocks that can provide enough heating to explain radiative losses of the upper chromosphere (e.g., Judge et al 2003 andFossum &Carlson 2006), although some heating of the low chromosphere appears possible from the numerical simulations. However, motions in the low chromosphere with velocities compatible with the observed line broadening or shift (which is usually not more than $1Y2 km s À1 in lines formed near the temperature minimum) cannot completely explain the observed extension of the CO line emission above the solar limb for about 5 scale heights (Ayres & Rabin 1996).…”
Section: Density Stratification and The Chromosphere Heightmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The computed behavior is not in obvious disagreement with these observations. If anything, data exist to suggest that, at least for the C ii 1335 multiplet, such models as we have constructed underestimate the effects of photon scattering (Judge, Carlsson, & Stein 2003 Consider a plane-parallel slab of thickness Z that is ''effectively thin'' in all spectral lines, for which the incident radiation at frequencies in the lines can be neglected. This is a valid approximation for the formation of most ions in the solar transition region and corona, because the bulk of the solar radiative flux at visible and IR wavelengths streams through these plasmas, and the UV and EUV flux from the lower atmosphere is small compared with the line emission.…”
Section: Center-to-limb Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming that this line is formed under the VR process, say, at T e % 3 ; 10 4 K, this would mean that the 584 8 line is blueshifted by between 0 and 5 km s À1 relative to the redshifted C ii 1037 8 lines (Fig. 6 of Peter & Judge 1999) but is not redshifted at all relative to the 1335 8 multiplet of C ii (Judge et al 2003). These He i 584 8 Doppler shifts are substantially less than the value of v NT % 10-14 km s À1 near 2 ; 10 4 K (Mariska et al 1978).…”
Section: Doppler Shifts and Vrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It seems likely that something is missing from the physics of the formation of upper chromospheric features that is not captured by the one-dimensional semiempirical models developed by Vernazza et al (1981). (Judge, Carlsson, & Stein 2003 have recently discussed this point. )…”
Section: Formation Heights/temperaturesmentioning
confidence: 99%