2009
DOI: 10.2172/963520
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Origin of Ultra High Energy Cosmic Rays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[9], and for fusion, in Refs. [12] and [13] and a paper in progress. Otherwise the main difference between the astrophysical dynamos and selfexcited spheromak dynamos for fusion concern the mission: in astrophysics, to explain jet/radiolobes as a failure of dynamo plasma confinement in the dynamo; in fusion, to achieve plasma confinement good enough to achieve nuclear ignition in a device smaller than tokamaks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[9], and for fusion, in Refs. [12] and [13] and a paper in progress. Otherwise the main difference between the astrophysical dynamos and selfexcited spheromak dynamos for fusion concern the mission: in astrophysics, to explain jet/radiolobes as a failure of dynamo plasma confinement in the dynamo; in fusion, to achieve plasma confinement good enough to achieve nuclear ignition in a device smaller than tokamaks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Refs. [11] and [12] use Eq. (10) to approximate the magnetic structure, giving simply Ψ TOR = (L/a) (lnR/a)Ψ POL with dynamo radius a, jet length L >> a, and radiolobe radius R ≈ L (confined by ambient pressure).…”
Section: Application To Accretion Disksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this section, we are mainly concerned with the central column of Figure 1, where magnetic relaxation by internal kink modes extending into the disk, discussed in Appendix B, can lead to a relaxed magnetic field with known profiles, hence describable by a 0-D model with the radius a, poloidal field B o and current I as parameters. The system evolution in time is dominated by inductance, the jet mass density being very low, just that needed to carry current ejected by an electrostatic sheath that forms at the disk surface at a location where the sheath voltage equals the energy required to escape gravity [6]. If collisions are negligible in the sheath, for a positively-charged disk the sheath current is a "runaway" ion beam with density n i given by:…”
Section: Accelerator Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…where <v> is the average ion speed carrying the current (→ c, the speed of light) and A the cross-sectional area. If collisions remain negligible in the jet, the runaway ion beam continues to carry the current in the jet, since relativistic electron (or electron-positron) current tends to be canceled in our fixed reference frame centered on the black hole, due to two-stream instability [6,12,13]. Higher density in laboratory jets is due to gas sources beyond the sheath.…”
Section: Accelerator Structurementioning
confidence: 99%