2016
DOI: 10.4171/cmh/390
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the $p$-converse of the Kolyvagin–Gross–Zagier theorem

Abstract: Abstract. Let A/Q be an elliptic curve having split multiplicative reduction at an odd prime p. Under some mild technical assumptions, we prove the statement:thus providing a 'p-converse' to a celebrated theorem of Kolyvagin-Gross-Zagier.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As explained in [5], the main result of [1] can be used to prove cases of Conjecture 2.3 when g and h are theta series associated with certain ray class characters of the same imaginary quadratic field in which p is inert (and P and Q are Heegner points). By combining this with an extension of the height computations carried out in [16,17], the article [4] proves instances of Conjecture 1.1 of [6] in this setting.…”
Section: Exceptional Zeros and Rational Points (Cf [14])mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As explained in [5], the main result of [1] can be used to prove cases of Conjecture 2.3 when g and h are theta series associated with certain ray class characters of the same imaginary quadratic field in which p is inert (and P and Q are Heegner points). By combining this with an extension of the height computations carried out in [16,17], the article [4] proves instances of Conjecture 1.1 of [6] in this setting.…”
Section: Exceptional Zeros and Rational Points (Cf [14])mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conjecture A is the higher weight counterpart of Kolyvagin's conjecture for elliptic curves, which was recently proved in many cases by W. Zhang in [32] (see also the paper [30] by Venerucci). From now on we assume Conjecture A.…”
Section: On the Structure Of Selmer Groupsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Our goal is to compute the integers r ± in Lemma 8.1 and the integers N i in (30). Unfortunately, in passing from Shafarevich-Tate groups to Selmer groups there is a loss of information and we are not able to compute all the N i as we did for X(K, W p ) in Theorem 7.3.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…K ]]-adic Gross-Zagier formula for Z ∞ is the following. (see [Ven16,(24)]). The constant term L Hi p,0 (f † φ /K) ∈ I vanishes by Proposition 2.2, and so the factorization (5.10) yields the following equality up to unit in O × φ : (5.11)…”
Section: The Aforementioned I[[γ Acmentioning
confidence: 99%