2017
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa64e3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Parallel and Oblique Firehose Instability in Fluid Models

Abstract: A brief analysis of the proton parallel and oblique firehose instability is presented from a fluid perspective and the results are compared to kinetic theory solutions obtained by the WHAMP code. It is shown that the classical CGL model very accurately describes the growth rate of these instabilities at sufficiently long spatial scales (small wavenumbers). The required stabilization of these instabilities at small spatial scales (high wavenumbers) naturally requires dispersive effects and the stabilization is … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The oblique firehose instability is not included in our model, both because it operates at~ k k and because kinetic theory is required for its correct description (Hunana and Zank 2017). Linearly, oblique firehose fluctuations grow faster than parallel firehose fluctuations (growth rate g b D + W | | 2 i max 1 2 , as opposed to 23 The linear mirror instability can be captured relatively accurately by the LF model that we use (if the equations are solved in 2 or 3 dimensions; see section 8 of Snyder et al 1997).…”
Section: Oblique Firehose Instabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The oblique firehose instability is not included in our model, both because it operates at~ k k and because kinetic theory is required for its correct description (Hunana and Zank 2017). Linearly, oblique firehose fluctuations grow faster than parallel firehose fluctuations (growth rate g b D + W | | 2 i max 1 2 , as opposed to 23 The linear mirror instability can be captured relatively accurately by the LF model that we use (if the equations are solved in 2 or 3 dimensions; see section 8 of Snyder et al 1997).…”
Section: Oblique Firehose Instabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the purpose of this paper we adopt the well-known CGL framework in which not only dispersion, but also heat flux effects are entirely neglected (Chew et al 1956). Despite these simplifying assumptions, the CGL model provides a good description of some effects due to thermal pressure anisotropy at the large scales, while a proper description of the dynamics at smaller scales would best require more sophisticated fluid models that include FLR effects (Hunana & Zank 2017) or even a full kinetic treatment. Ion-acoustic Landau damping may be modeled phenomenologically by adding an appropriate drag term to the longitudinal component of the momentum equation.…”
Section: Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CGL marginal stability threshold arises at larger pressure anisotropies than those derived from kinetic theory(Klein and Howes, 2015;Hunana and Zank, 2017), which, combined with the limited relevance of a fluid theory to a weakly collisionless system, limits this instability's relevance to the solar wind.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%