Solid Propellant Rocket Conference 1964
DOI: 10.2514/6.1964-116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the performance of solid propellants containing metal additives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1965
1965
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They can contribute to two-phase flow losses (thermal and viscous disequilibrium through the nozzle), which can reduce overall motor performance by as much as 10% [1,23,39]. Additionally, large condensed phase droplets have been shown to cause combustion inefficiencies, energy losses from the combustion products to the rocket motor hardware (i.e., heat loss and droplet impingement), and boundary layer losses; together, these losses can contribute an additional 2-8% overall performance loss [1].…”
Section: Solid Propellant Formulation and Combustion Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They can contribute to two-phase flow losses (thermal and viscous disequilibrium through the nozzle), which can reduce overall motor performance by as much as 10% [1,23,39]. Additionally, large condensed phase droplets have been shown to cause combustion inefficiencies, energy losses from the combustion products to the rocket motor hardware (i.e., heat loss and droplet impingement), and boundary layer losses; together, these losses can contribute an additional 2-8% overall performance loss [1].…”
Section: Solid Propellant Formulation and Combustion Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These devices are based on the impact of the particles trailed by a supersonic flow on a collection plate. Microscopy observations would be performed on the particles collided with the collection plate in order to have an insight into the CCPs particle size and structure [8] [9]. The technique was not optimal since it did not take into account the possible T American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics effect of shock waves and coalescence in the exhaust plume, these last processes leading to liquid particle shattering and coalescence, respectively.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The technique was not optimal since it did not take into account the possible T American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics effect of shock waves and coalescence in the exhaust plume, these last processes leading to liquid particle shattering and coalescence, respectively. These studies pointed out that the CCP particle size was slightly affected by the combustion chamber pressure (i.e., low pressure promotes smaller particles [9]), the propellant composition, the expansion ratios, the residence time, and, the initial metal particle diameter. The initial metal particles diameter inside the motor was one order magnitude lower with respect to the CCP size, clearly suggesting that the coalescence process occurred in the nozzle [8].…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…27 On the basis of this concept and a number of simplifying assumptions, the linear relation observed by Sehgal was derived. 37 However, additional factors give much more weight to an approach based on chemical kinetics of condensation as discussed below. Figure 3 shows the influence of mean residence time on the exhaust particle size.…”
Section: Effect Of Pressure and Residence Timementioning
confidence: 99%