2022
DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2022.2120975
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the persistence and complementarities of design and technological change: a regional perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 79 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Still, for our purpose here it is most relevant that design rights capture design activities, which might not represent design innovations themselves but still play a role in innovation processes (Marsili and Salter, 2006). It is fair to say that the use of design rights as innovation metrics is still somewhat experimental, but they are finding their way into regional studies (see Castaldi and Drivas, 2023; Corradini and Karoglou, 2023; Pinate et al, 2023).…”
Section: Innovation Metrics Complementing Patentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, for our purpose here it is most relevant that design rights capture design activities, which might not represent design innovations themselves but still play a role in innovation processes (Marsili and Salter, 2006). It is fair to say that the use of design rights as innovation metrics is still somewhat experimental, but they are finding their way into regional studies (see Castaldi and Drivas, 2023; Corradini and Karoglou, 2023; Pinate et al, 2023).…”
Section: Innovation Metrics Complementing Patentsmentioning
confidence: 99%