2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.06.134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the phase stability of CaCu5-type compounds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The DT model achieves competitively high performance (Figure ) and was very fast to develop, taking <15 min to train the data and about 3 h to make predictions on >400000 candidates (or <0.05 s per compound). It makes use of a much smaller number of descriptors (16) that are weighted sums or absolute differences of elemental properties based on position in the periodic table (number of valence electrons n valence , group number n group , and Mendeleev number MN ), radius (Zunger sum of pseudopotential orbital radii r Zunger = r s + r p ), electronegativity (χ Allen ), , bulk density (ρ), and two interesting parameters that were first proposed by Miedema to predict the heats of formation of binary alloys: an adjusted work function ϕ* and the cube root of the average electron density at boundary of Wigner–Seitz cell n WS 1/3 . In Miedema’s original formulation, the values of ϕ* correlate with electronegativity, so differences in ϕ* measure the degree of electron transfer between two dissimilar metals, whereas differences in n WS 1/3 relate to the gradient of electron density between neighboring atoms and influence properties such as compressibility and bulk modulus . Miedema’s empirical model forms the basis for the estimation of thermodynamic properties, including construction of phase diagrams and evaluating miscibility of metals .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The DT model achieves competitively high performance (Figure ) and was very fast to develop, taking <15 min to train the data and about 3 h to make predictions on >400000 candidates (or <0.05 s per compound). It makes use of a much smaller number of descriptors (16) that are weighted sums or absolute differences of elemental properties based on position in the periodic table (number of valence electrons n valence , group number n group , and Mendeleev number MN ), radius (Zunger sum of pseudopotential orbital radii r Zunger = r s + r p ), electronegativity (χ Allen ), , bulk density (ρ), and two interesting parameters that were first proposed by Miedema to predict the heats of formation of binary alloys: an adjusted work function ϕ* and the cube root of the average electron density at boundary of Wigner–Seitz cell n WS 1/3 . In Miedema’s original formulation, the values of ϕ* correlate with electronegativity, so differences in ϕ* measure the degree of electron transfer between two dissimilar metals, whereas differences in n WS 1/3 relate to the gradient of electron density between neighboring atoms and influence properties such as compressibility and bulk modulus . Miedema’s empirical model forms the basis for the estimation of thermodynamic properties, including construction of phase diagrams and evaluating miscibility of metals .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As post-hoc rationalization of these results, the ranges of solid solubility in Cd­(Cu 1– x Sb x ) 2 , Cd­(Cu 1– x Sn x ) 2 , and Cd­(Cu 1– x Zn x ) 2 can be correlated to the relative solubility of Sb, Sn, or Zn in Cu, suggesting that perhaps a simpler model with fewer features could be sufficient to predict their formation. Given that the Miedema model has been previously applied to evaluate the phase stability of related intermetallic compounds, such as CaCu 5 -type phases, using only ϕ* and n WS 1/3 as features, it is interesting to see how it would perform in predicting Laves phases. DT models built with only one or two of these types of features are much less accurate than the full-feature DT model (Table S6).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For selected examples in the field of magnetic and hydrogen storage materials as well as on phase stability calculations we refer to recent overviews. [31][32][33]…”
Section: Crystal Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The many non‐stoichiometric compositions (mixing is known for both copper positions of the aristotype; formation of extended homogeneity ranges/solid solutions) listed for the CaCu 5 types entries in the Pearson data base [2] prove this behavior. For selected examples in the field of magnetic and hydrogen storage materials as well as on phase stability calculations we refer to recent overviews [31–33] …”
Section: Crystal Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The A site is usually occupied by La, Ca or rare earth element while Ni, Cu, Co, Pt or Fe fill the B site [59]. AB 5 alloys are known to have a CuCa 5 -type hexagonal crystal structure which normally belongs to space group P6/mmm (#191) [60,61]. Singh et al [62] evaluated the effect of milling MmNi 4:6 Fe 0:4 alloy, where Mm refers to mischmetal, varying the milling period from 10, 20 and 30 min, at a milling speed of 200 rpm.…”
Section: Structural Characteristics Of Mechanically Milled Ab 5 -Type...mentioning
confidence: 99%