2020
DOI: 10.1002/adts.201900230
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Physical Origins of Charge Separation at Donor–Acceptor Interfaces in Organic Solar Cells: Energy Bending versus Energy Disorder

Abstract: Charge separation (CS) is a central process in the working of organic solar cells (OSC). Despite the strong electron–hole (e–h) Coulombic attraction at the donor–acceptor (D–A) interface, the bound e–h pairs do separate into free charges following an ultrafast process. To explain these results, several models have been proposed. By means of kinetic Monte Carlo simulations, the energy bending (EB) at the D–A interface is considered as the driving force for CS against the impact of energy disorder. The results s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This energy level bending is due to the gradual change in the electrostatic potential created by the quadrupole moments of the NFA and the donor polymer. [45][46][47][48][49][50][51] The energy level is bent in the direction that corresponds to the (negative) sign of the in-plane quadrupole moment of the acceptor-donor-acceptor (A-D-A) NFA molecule. Because of energy level bending, the CT state energy increases, and the IE difference narrows by approximately the same amount at the interface.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This energy level bending is due to the gradual change in the electrostatic potential created by the quadrupole moments of the NFA and the donor polymer. [45][46][47][48][49][50][51] The energy level is bent in the direction that corresponds to the (negative) sign of the in-plane quadrupole moment of the acceptor-donor-acceptor (A-D-A) NFA molecule. Because of energy level bending, the CT state energy increases, and the IE difference narrows by approximately the same amount at the interface.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3,4] This does not rule out that a more expanded electron-hole pair may initially be generated but it indicates that the vast majority of such "hot" electron-hole-pairs relax to cold states within the coulomb well before they execute a random walk to escape from it. [1,2,[5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] The crucial entity in the dissociation process is therefore the CT state of the donor-acceptor couple and to unravel its properties is an important issue. [13,14] The usual formalism to describe the dynamics of CT states rests upon the classic Marcus theory of electron transfer [15] and its extension by Levich, Jortner, and Marcus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, photoexcitation of organic semiconductors generates excitons that are coulombically bound electron–hole pairs. , The excitons formed in D or A can diffuse up to the D/A interface, where they are more easily dissociated, thus generating free charges. The free charges are then transported to their respective electrodes, producing the device’s photocurrent response …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%