2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2201.03208
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Polarisation of Radio Relics

Abstract: This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A much smoother increase is expected for Mach numbers higher than 3, with < p >= 64 % for M = 4.5. A similar trend is obtained by more complex semi-analytical models which also considered the dependence on magnetic field strength (Hoeft et al 2022).…”
Section: Fractional Polarization and Mach Numbersupporting
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A much smoother increase is expected for Mach numbers higher than 3, with < p >= 64 % for M = 4.5. A similar trend is obtained by more complex semi-analytical models which also considered the dependence on magnetic field strength (Hoeft et al 2022).…”
Section: Fractional Polarization and Mach Numbersupporting
confidence: 82%
“…This trend can be reproduced by simulations considering a M = 3 shock wave propagating through a medium perturbed by decaying subsonic turbulence in the ICM (Domínguez-Fernández et al 2021). This trend can be also reproduced with semi-analytical models based on shock compression of a small-scale tangled magnetic field, although this result was found to strongly depend on the magnetic field strength (Hoeft et al 2022). Furthermore, the morphology of simulated polarized emission resembles the structures of the underlying turbulent ICM, creating threads and filaments (Domínguez-Fernández et al 2021).…”
Section: Fractional Polarization and Depolarization Effectsmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, while the majority of injection-derived Mach numbers are lower than 3, the distribution of M int is shifted towards higher values where we expect a weaker correlation between fractional polarization and Mach number (see Fig. 1 in Hoeft et al 2022). If the Mach number distribution would be the one described by M inj we would have found a stronger correlation.…”
Section: Fractional Polarization and Mach Numbermentioning
confidence: 68%
“…-We found a weak positive correlation between the fractional polarization of relics and shock Mach number estimated from the integrated spectrum of radio relics (Spearman coefficient ∼ 0.3). Such a weak correlation is expected for Mach numbers higher than 2.5, while for lower values a stronger correlation would be expected (Hoeft et al 2022). This suggests that most radio relics reach a maximum Mach number higher than 2.5 and that Mach number estimates from X-ray or from injection radio spectral indexes are biased towards lower values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%