2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.tcs.2018.06.052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the positive semi-definite property of similarity matrices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first proof sees the cosine pairwise similarity matrix as written as the Hadamard product between two matrices, say and , respectively, defined as The former is the Gram matrix between histograms, therefore it trivially satisfies Mercer’s condition [ 91 ]. The latter has been shown to be positive semi-definite in [ 92 ]. Therefore, thanks to Theorem 1, HCK is a valid kernel.…”
Section: On the Positive Definiteness Of The Proposed Kernelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first proof sees the cosine pairwise similarity matrix as written as the Hadamard product between two matrices, say and , respectively, defined as The former is the Gram matrix between histograms, therefore it trivially satisfies Mercer’s condition [ 91 ]. The latter has been shown to be positive semi-definite in [ 92 ]. Therefore, thanks to Theorem 1, HCK is a valid kernel.…”
Section: On the Positive Definiteness Of The Proposed Kernelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the paper [7] published in this journal an interesting Conjecture is presented concerning the positive definiteness of some similarities very much related to Fuzzy Logic [11] and especially to the theory of indistinguishability operators [8]. This Conjecture is not true in its current form as will be stated in the next section but in Section 3 a reformulation leading to interesting consequences is stated and proved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Definition 1.1. [7] Let E be a finite set and let P (E) be its power set. A similarity is a mapping s from P (E) × P (E) into R + such that a) s(X, Y ) = s(Y, X) for all X, Y ∈ P (E) b) s(X, Y ) ≤ s(X, X) for all X, Y ∈ P (E).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations