2014
DOI: 10.1134/s1063771014060050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the possible mechanism of the jet noise intensification near a wing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This linear dependence is in an agreement with theoretical predictions and seems to validate the mechanism of noise generation and intensification proposed in [9]. It has also been experimentally shown that core flow velocity does not noticeably affect JFI noise, which is determined by bypass flow velocity (high-frequency region) and coflow velocity (low-frequency region).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This linear dependence is in an agreement with theoretical predictions and seems to validate the mechanism of noise generation and intensification proposed in [9]. It has also been experimentally shown that core flow velocity does not noticeably affect JFI noise, which is determined by bypass flow velocity (high-frequency region) and coflow velocity (low-frequency region).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…For subsonic jets, they result primarily in pressure pulsations exponentially decaying in the sideline direction with only a small fraction of acoustic energy radiating in the far field. When the wing trailing edge is placed in the jet nearfield, the non-radiating hydrodynamic pulsations are diffracted into acoustic waves thus significantly intensifying far field noise [3,9].…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is worth noting that the trailing-edge scattering mechanism of the hydrodynamic field has been suggested in several earlier works, for example those of Lawrence et al (2011) and Bychkov & Faranosov (2014). However, the term of hydrodynamic field is not always same as the evanescent wave mentioned here, for both non-linear and linear regions of hydrodynamic field exist.…”
Section: Near-field Scatteringmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Due to the presence of the flat plate, we switch back to the Cartesian coordinates defined in figure 2 again. When the flat plate is sufficiently far away from the jet axis, for example the perpendicular distance between the plate and the jet axis is greater than 2D, little change of the flow occurs due to the presence of the plate and therefore the near-field evanescent waves, originating from hydrodynamic instability waves, can be found to be virtually same as that for an isolated jet (Bychkov & Faranosov 2014). We can thus use the evanescent wave field for an isolated jet as the incident evanescent field for an installed jet.…”
Section: Near-field Pressure Scatteringmentioning
confidence: 99%