2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the possible roles of microsaccades and drifts in visual perception

Abstract: During natural viewing large saccades shift the visual gaze from one target to another every few hundreds of milliseconds. The role of microsaccades (MSs), small saccades that show up during long fixations, is still debated. A major debate is whether MSs are used to redirect the visual gaze to a new location or to encode visual information through their movement. We argue that these two functions cannot be optimized simultaneously and present several pieces of evidence suggesting that MSs redirect the visual g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
33
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A few studies focusing on large saccades performed during exploration tasks have examined how the durations of intervals between consecutive saccades (the intersaccadic intervals) are modulated by the type of display being explored. Some of these studies have found longer intersaccadic intervals with higher stimulus intensity (e.g., higher spatial frequency: Rayner, 1998;Ojanpaa, Nasanen, & Kojo, 2002;Ahissar, Arieli, Fried, & Bonneh, 2016); others have found the opposite (Nasanen, Ojanpaa, & Kojo, 2001;Henderson, 2003) or no effects at all (Einhäuser & König, 2003;Itti, 2005). Only one previous study has asked a similar question on microsaccades (Otero-Millan, Troncoso, Macknik, Serrano-Pedraza, & Mar-tinez- Conde, 2008), and found no evidence for an effect of display on their temporal dynamics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few studies focusing on large saccades performed during exploration tasks have examined how the durations of intervals between consecutive saccades (the intersaccadic intervals) are modulated by the type of display being explored. Some of these studies have found longer intersaccadic intervals with higher stimulus intensity (e.g., higher spatial frequency: Rayner, 1998;Ojanpaa, Nasanen, & Kojo, 2002;Ahissar, Arieli, Fried, & Bonneh, 2016); others have found the opposite (Nasanen, Ojanpaa, & Kojo, 2001;Henderson, 2003) or no effects at all (Einhäuser & König, 2003;Itti, 2005). Only one previous study has asked a similar question on microsaccades (Otero-Millan, Troncoso, Macknik, Serrano-Pedraza, & Mar-tinez- Conde, 2008), and found no evidence for an effect of display on their temporal dynamics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While their exact contribution to vision is still debated 1, 2 , their direction and timing have been linked to anticipation, surprise, and attentional shifts 38 . Microsaccades are typically inhibited for approximately 300 ms post stimulus onset 5, 9 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, although the eyes move continuously (Ahissar et al, 2016), it is common to discount this motion and to consider the incoming sensory signal to be the image presented on the screen. The equivalence between external stimulus and input to the sensory processing pathway is sufficient because, to a first approximation, the eye does not change form or function as it absorbs the stimulus.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%