2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00037-015-0114-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the power of algebraic branching programs of width two

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it is interesting to examine the power of 2-register noncommutative arithmetic computations. Width-2 noncommutative ABPs are also not universal [AW11]. However, the noncommutative version of Model 1 is universal.…”
Section: Noncommutative 2-register Arithmetic Computationsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, it is interesting to examine the power of 2-register noncommutative arithmetic computations. Width-2 noncommutative ABPs are also not universal [AW11]. However, the noncommutative version of Model 1 is universal.…”
Section: Noncommutative 2-register Arithmetic Computationsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Model 1 is universal by Lemma 1. In the absence of instruction (3) (which allows resets R i := c for any c ∈ F), the model can be simulated by width-2 arithmetic branching programs (ABP), which are not universal, as shown by Allender and Wang [AW11]. As mentioned earlier, they give a sparse polynomial that is not width-2 ABP computable.…”
Section: Epiloguementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a matter of curiosity, one may want to know: is the width-3 upper bound tight? Allender and Wang [AW11] recently settled this question affirmatively: they show that a very simple polynomial cannot be computed by any width-2 ABP, no matter what the length. On the other hand, width-3 ABPs are universal, since every polynomial family has some formula family computing it.…”
Section: The Current Statusmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Our results show that border continuant complexity is polynomially equivalent to border formula size. This insight is quite striking because a result of Allender and Wang [1] implies that the continuant complexity without allowing approximations can be infinite! Continuous Lower Bounds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%