2015
DOI: 10.1109/tase.2014.2331983
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Power of Manifold Samples in Exploring Configuration Spaces and the Dimensionality of Narrow Passages

Abstract: We extend our study of Motion Planning via Manifold Samples (MMS), a general algorithmic framework that combines geometric methods for the exact and complete analysis of low-dimensional configuration spaces with sampling-based approaches that are appropriate for higher dimensions. The framework explores the configuration space by taking samples that are entire low-dimensional manifolds of the configuration space capturing its connectivity much better than isolated point samples. The contributions of this paper… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the advent of robot swarms, practical solutions to these problems became more important and the robotics community started to develop practical sampling-based algorithms [31,49,50,59,60,64,70] which, while working well in practice, are not guaranteed to find an (optimal) solution. In another recent work, Yu and Rus [75] present a practical algorithm based on a fine-grained discretization combined with an IP for the resulting discrete problem to provide near-optimal solutions even for densely populated environments.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the advent of robot swarms, practical solutions to these problems became more important and the robotics community started to develop practical sampling-based algorithms [31,49,50,59,60,64,70] which, while working well in practice, are not guaranteed to find an (optimal) solution. In another recent work, Yu and Rus [75] present a practical algorithm based on a fine-grained discretization combined with an IP for the resulting discrete problem to provide near-optimal solutions even for densely populated environments.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to that, centralized approaches (Kloder and Hutchinson, 2005;O'Donnell and Lozano-Pérez, 1989;Salzman et al, 2015;Solovey et al, 2015a;Svestka and Overmars, 1998;Wagner and Choset, 2013) usually work in the combined high-dimensional configuration space, and thus tend to be slower than decoupled techniques. However, centralized algorithms often come with stronger theoretical guarantees, such as completeness.…”
Section: Prior Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such an approach suffers from inefficiency as it overlooks aspects of multi-robot planning, and hence can handle only a very small number of robots. Several techniques tailored for instances of MMP involving a small number of robots have been described (Hirsch and Halperin, 2004;Salzman et al, 2015).…”
Section: Prior Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multi-robot motion planning research has approached the problem with decentralized solutions [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12] which reduce search space size by partitioning the problem into several sub-problems but typically lack completeness and optimality guarantees. In contrast, centralized approaches [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18] usually work in the combined high-dimensional configuration spaces, and thus tend to be slower than decoupled techniques but provide stronger theoretical guarantees.…”
Section: A Foundationsmentioning
confidence: 99%