Research progress in voting studies and party competition, the mass media, work on social movements, interest groups and collective action, is reviewed for the last decade. Theoretical impetus in applied work seems weak in British studies; sub-fields of research are being pursued in isolation. In electoral studies at least there are signs of over-specialization and loss of valuable interconnections with the mainstream of political science. A number of pathways for improving the state of the art are identified, focusing on a renewal of theoretical input, the correction of some 'system biases', greater methodological pluralism and more integration of demand-side and supply-side studies. ' D. Butler and D. Stokes, Polirical Change in Britain (Basingstoke, Macmillan, 1969; 2nd edn, 1974).* B. Sarlvik and 1. Crewe, Decade of Dealignment (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, ' A. Heath, R. Jowell and J. Curtice, How Brirain Votes (Oxford, Pergamon,1985). A new edition 1983). is forthcoming. 39 B. OLeary, 'Appendix 4: party support in Northern Ireland, 1969-89', in J. McGarry and B. R. Taagepera and M. S. Shugart, Seats and Votes: The Effects and Determinants of Electoral 41 Heath et al., How Britain Votes; Heath and MacDonald, 'Demise ofparty identification theory? 42 W. L. Miller, J. Brand and M. Jordan, 'On the power or vulnerability of the British press: a dynamic analysis', British