Proceedings of the International Conference of Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering 2019 (Iccmse-2019) 2019
DOI: 10.1063/1.5137948
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the prediction of dispenser status in ATM using gradient boosting method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, classical and deep learning methods were applied to this problem, the performance comparison of which are given in Vangala and Vadlamani (2020) and Hasheminejad and Reisjafari (2017). However, an analysis of the literature shows that classical machine learning methods such as regression analysis (Rajwani et al 2017), support vector machines (Jadwal et al 2018), dynamic programming (Ozer et al 2019), ARIMA (Khanarsa and Sinapiromsaran 2017), and gradient boosting (Shcherbitsky et al 2019) are used much more often.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, classical and deep learning methods were applied to this problem, the performance comparison of which are given in Vangala and Vadlamani (2020) and Hasheminejad and Reisjafari (2017). However, an analysis of the literature shows that classical machine learning methods such as regression analysis (Rajwani et al 2017), support vector machines (Jadwal et al 2018), dynamic programming (Ozer et al 2019), ARIMA (Khanarsa and Sinapiromsaran 2017), and gradient boosting (Shcherbitsky et al 2019) are used much more often.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%