1968
DOI: 10.2307/411901
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Prehistory of Nez Perce Vowel Harmony

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Harmony is bidirectional. Empirical discussion of this system may be found in Aoki (1970) and Crook (1999); theoretical discussions may be found in Zimmer (1967), Chomsky and Halle (1968), Jacobsen (1968), Rigsby and Silverstein (1969), Zwicky (1971), Hall and Hall (1977), Crook (1999), Bakovic (2000), and Mackenzie and Dresher (2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Harmony is bidirectional. Empirical discussion of this system may be found in Aoki (1970) and Crook (1999); theoretical discussions may be found in Zimmer (1967), Chomsky and Halle (1968), Jacobsen (1968), Rigsby and Silverstein (1969), Zwicky (1971), Hall and Hall (1977), Crook (1999), Bakovic (2000), and Mackenzie and Dresher (2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nez Perce vowel harmony has predominately been described in terms of ATR or RTR (advanced or retracted tongue root) (Jacobsen 1968;Rigsby and Silverstein 1969;Zwicky 1971;Hall and Hall 1980;Bakovic 2000;MacKenzie and Dresher 2003), though the system does not appear to fit an ATR analysis; many of the features seen in ATR vowel systems are not seen in the Nez Perce vowels. The dominant vowels are usually +ATR in an ATR vowel harmony language (Hall and Hall 1980: 220-221;Casali 2003: 307), however if Nez Perce does indeed display ATR vowel harmony, the dominant set is the -ATR vowels while the recessive set is the +ATR vowels (Hall and Hall 1980: 220-221).…”
Section: Recessivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The language is a member of the Sahaptin branch of the Penutian language family and is most closely related to Sahaptian. Its phonology has been a subject of great interest, due to the language's unusual vowel harmony system (Aoki 1966;Zimmer 1968;Jacobsen 1968;Rigsby and Silverstein 1969;Zwicky 1970;Silverstein 1979;Hall and Hall 1980;Crook 1999;Bakovic 2000;MacKenzie and Dresher 2003). None of these previous phonological studies, however, have included any acoustic data to support their analyses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%