2014
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114292
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Pressure Response in the Brain due to Short Duration Blunt Impacts

Abstract: When the head is subject to non-penetrating (blunt) impact, contusion-type injuries are commonly identified beneath the impact site (the coup) and, in some instances, at the opposite pole (the contre-coup). This pattern of injury has long eluded satisfactory explanation and blunt head injury mechanisms in general remain poorly understood. There are only a small number of studies in the open literature investigating the head's response to short duration impacts, which can occur in collisions with light projecti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of Pearce and Young 15 highlighted the importance of repetitive short duration high impacts, which were also observed in our study, suggesting the head to be susceptible to critical intercranial pressure transients upon impact. In our study, the base of the brain still received 78.41 N (7.08% of the initial impact force), which indicates that the brain is still subject to inertial forces and highlights the potential danger of repetitive impact forces to the head.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The results of Pearce and Young 15 highlighted the importance of repetitive short duration high impacts, which were also observed in our study, suggesting the head to be susceptible to critical intercranial pressure transients upon impact. In our study, the base of the brain still received 78.41 N (7.08% of the initial impact force), which indicates that the brain is still subject to inertial forces and highlights the potential danger of repetitive impact forces to the head.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The shape of the cerebrum is approximated to a sphere, without clear representation of gyri and sulci structures on the brain surface. 1,3,5,[10][11][12][13][14] One of the earliest models 15 used a spherical liquid mass model to represent head where simple boundary conditions with homogeneous material properties were assumed, and coup and contrecoup pressures were observed. Subsequently, a number of intricate three-dimensional (3D) models were reported, resulting in an improved understanding of TBI mechanics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the loading time is short, and tissue strains are small. Therefore, previous studies have used pressure or stress response in the brain to quantify the injury [ 12 , 13 ]. However, the mechanical response (stress/pressure), obtained at a tissue level, might not be fully representative of the pathological changes (such as axonal swellings along the axonal tracts) in the brain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%