2017
DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.10752.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the primacy and irreducible nature of first-person versus third-person information

Abstract: In this essay, we will support the claim that at the current level of scientific advancement a) some first-person accounts cannot be reduced to their third-person neural and psychophysiological correlates and b) that these first-person accounts are the only information to reckon when it is necessary to analyse qualia contents. Consequently, for many phenomena, first-person accounts are the only reliable source of information available and the knowledge of their neural and psychophysical correlates don’t offer … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
(95 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our primary purpose was not the mechanist-reductionist approach, only aimed to check the neuro-correlates of hypnosis; rather, it was to exploit hypnosis in the attempt of better understanding OBE neurophenomenology. Here, the neurophysiological investigations may help joining subjective experience and their neuro-correlates in a whole, as the two inescapable sides of the so-called and still unsolved "hard problem" − a neglected topic by the monist materialist approach, despite its crucial relevance for the understanding of consciousness (Facco & Fracas, 2018;Facco et al, 2017;Tressoldi et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our primary purpose was not the mechanist-reductionist approach, only aimed to check the neuro-correlates of hypnosis; rather, it was to exploit hypnosis in the attempt of better understanding OBE neurophenomenology. Here, the neurophysiological investigations may help joining subjective experience and their neuro-correlates in a whole, as the two inescapable sides of the so-called and still unsolved "hard problem" − a neglected topic by the monist materialist approach, despite its crucial relevance for the understanding of consciousness (Facco & Fracas, 2018;Facco et al, 2017;Tressoldi et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2The 1PP can be defined as the phenomenological, subjective mental contents, also defined as “qualia,” the person is aware of and can communicate to others by language and behavior (Nida-Rümelin, 2015; Tressoldi, Facco, & Lucangeli, 2017; Tye, 2018). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%