2006
DOI: 10.1088/0305-4470/39/20/029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the problem of mass dependence of the two-point function of the real scalar free massive field on the light cone

Abstract: We investigate the generally assumed inconsistency in light cone quantum field theory that the restriction of a massive, real, scalar, free field to the nullplane Σ = {x 0 + x 3 = 0} is independent of mass 8 , but the restriction of the two-point function is mass-dependent (see, e.g., 9,16 ). We resolve this inconsistency by showing that the two-point function has no canonical restriction to Σ in the sense of distribution theory. Only the so-called tame restriction of the two-point function, which we have intr… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand the Lorentz invariance of (71) means that it has no dependence on z − . Furthermore, (71) is not even a distribution on the Schlieder-Seiler functions because the integral behaves like 1 z 2 ⊥ at the origin [9]. The difference in (71) and ( 72) is because the order of the light-front limit and integral matters.…”
Section: Equivalencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On the other hand the Lorentz invariance of (71) means that it has no dependence on z − . Furthermore, (71) is not even a distribution on the Schlieder-Seiler functions because the integral behaves like 1 z 2 ⊥ at the origin [9]. The difference in (71) and ( 72) is because the order of the light-front limit and integral matters.…”
Section: Equivalencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the vacuum is annihilated by the light-front annihilation operator then (74) can be used to calculate the two-point Wightman function in terms of the restriction to the light front 0|φ(x)φ(y)|0 = 1 8(2π) 9 dx 1 dỹ 1 d kdp dq q + θ(q + )e…”
Section: Extension To the Local Algebramentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…) do not have a canonical restriction to {x 0 + x 3 = 0}. This can be seen by considering the wave front set of D (±) (see [19]). Now the following proposition shows that we can retrieve parameter dependence if we consider the relaxation u * instead of u. ))…”
Section: The Tame Restriction Of a Generalized Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%