2018
DOI: 10.1029/2017ja025143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Quasi‐linear Saturation of the Parallel Proton Firehose Instability Using a Full‐f Approach

Abstract: A classic example for the application of quasi‐linear theory to electromagnetic wave‐particle interactions, the saturation of the parallel proton firehose instability, is usually considered in the long‐wavelength approximation although for βfalse∥,normalp≲25 this instability is dominated by anomalous cyclotron resonance, which invalidates a macroscopic treatment (Gary et al., 1998, https://doi.org/10.1029/98JA01174). To relax the long‐wavelength approximation, Seough et al. (2015, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.49… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Model VDFs (e.g., drifting bi-Maxwellians) reduce the complexity of numerical evaluations of the growth and effects of microinstabilities and act to classify them so they can be compared. However, this work highlights the need for more detailed knowledge of the VDF in order to reliably evaluate the behavior of microinstabilities and the subsequent quasilinear evolution in collisionless plasmas (see Astfalk & Jenko 2017;Dorfman et al 2017;Astfalk & Jenko 2018;Verscharen et al 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Model VDFs (e.g., drifting bi-Maxwellians) reduce the complexity of numerical evaluations of the growth and effects of microinstabilities and act to classify them so they can be compared. However, this work highlights the need for more detailed knowledge of the VDF in order to reliably evaluate the behavior of microinstabilities and the subsequent quasilinear evolution in collisionless plasmas (see Astfalk & Jenko 2017;Dorfman et al 2017;Astfalk & Jenko 2018;Verscharen et al 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%