2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10035-011-0305-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the quasi-static granular convective flow and sand densification around pile foundations under cyclic lateral loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
27
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
6
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5b, G increases dramatically with reducing γ max as expected, and in all cases G reduces slightly during cyclic loading. The results correlated quite well with the observations from scaled model tests with different types of offshore wind turbine foundations [4][5][6]27] and the field measuremens [28]. With the same magnitude of (γ max − γ min ) in Series C, the two-way loading resulted in higher G than the oneway loading in the first few hundred cycles (Fig.…”
Section: Macro-scale Responsessupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5b, G increases dramatically with reducing γ max as expected, and in all cases G reduces slightly during cyclic loading. The results correlated quite well with the observations from scaled model tests with different types of offshore wind turbine foundations [4][5][6]27] and the field measuremens [28]. With the same magnitude of (γ max − γ min ) in Series C, the two-way loading resulted in higher G than the oneway loading in the first few hundred cycles (Fig.…”
Section: Macro-scale Responsessupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Designing foundations for offshore wind turbines is challenging as: (1) these are dynamically sensitive structures in the sense that natural frequencies of these structures are very close to the forcing frequencies [1]; (2) cyclic loading can induce accumulated rotation of foundation but the tolerance for the total rotation at seabed is suggested as low as 0.5° in DNV [2]. The soil-foundation interactions under cyclic lateral loading have been investigated intensively by field tests [3], scaled model tests [4][5][6][7][8][9][10], FEM simulations [11] and DEM simulations [12,13] with majority focused on mono-pile foundations as it is the main type of foundation for offshore wind turbines. Empirical relationships for the foundation tilt or stiffness were derived from the model tests but few attention was drawn on the soil disturbances due to the limitations of monitoring technique.…”
Section: Background and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicated that the extent of the densified region was significantly smaller for 1w and unbalanced 2w lateral loading (as compared with balanced 2w lateral loading), consistent with the experimental observations reported by Brown et al (1988). Further, the size of the depression cones observed (applying up to 42% of the ultimate static lateral load-carrying capacity of the pile, P u ) were in broad agreement with the experimental observations from model studies on monopiles embedded in saturated dense sand beds reported by Cuéllar et al (2012). & From the experimental investigations, the discusser concurs that the main reason for the measured/computed increase in secant stiffness with cycling is convective sand flow and the resulting densification around the monopile, most likely due to cyclic shear deformation of the soil mass adjacent to the pile, which causes a net contraction of the sand to occur (Gudehus, 2000).…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…It can also be observed that vertical accumulated strain is proportional to the shear strain amplitude but inversely proportional to the relative density of soil. The results correlated quite well with the observations from scaled model tests with different types of offshore wind turbine foundations [2,3,7]. The only abnormal trend observed is that the accumulated vertical strain decreases with increasing vertical stress.…”
Section: Experimental Testssupporting
confidence: 79%