2009
DOI: 10.1515/jgt.2008.089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the rank of a Coxeter group

Abstract: Abstract. In this paper, the set of all possible ranks of an arbitrary Coxeter group is determined.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proof of this is split into two parts, one of which is published in , the other covering the major part of the present paper. The paper uses only basic results from the theory of Coxeter systems and elementary (but less known) techniques from . This is not true for the second part of the proof of Theorem 1, presented here, because it uses the full power of the main result in .…”
Section: Statement Of the Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The proof of this is split into two parts, one of which is published in , the other covering the major part of the present paper. The paper uses only basic results from the theory of Coxeter systems and elementary (but less known) techniques from . This is not true for the second part of the proof of Theorem 1, presented here, because it uses the full power of the main result in .…”
Section: Statement Of the Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The question of reversing the blowing up construction for Coxeter generating sets was addressed by Mihalik and Ratcliffe in . They introduced a blowing down procedure, which decreases the rank.…”
Section: Spherical Principal Components and Blowing Downmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, the case of right-angled generators is the only one where the blowing down procedure for Coxeter generating sets comes into play. The latter has been introduced in [12] and some of our intermediate results should be compared with those in [12]. However, our treatment is completely independent because our assumptions and goals are quite different from those in [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter has been introduced in [12] and some of our intermediate results should be compared with those in [12]. However, our treatment is completely independent because our assumptions and goals are quite different from those in [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%