2019
DOI: 10.1109/lcomm.2019.2941476
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Real Capacity of LoRa Networks: The Impact of Non-Destructive Communications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2) Single-User Receiver with Soft-Decoding Assuming a hard threshold for the capture effect as described above or in other publications [7], [9] is however pessimistic. In fact, in some cases, a packet can still be demodulated for lower differences in received power ∆P between two same-SF colliding nodes (same-SF SIR) [8]. To allow for a fair comparison between conventional single-user LoRa receivers and our proposed two-user receiver, we here seek to better model the performance of a single-user soft-detector in the presence of a single same-SF interferer.…”
Section: ) Threshold-based Single-user Receivermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2) Single-User Receiver with Soft-Decoding Assuming a hard threshold for the capture effect as described above or in other publications [7], [9] is however pessimistic. In fact, in some cases, a packet can still be demodulated for lower differences in received power ∆P between two same-SF colliding nodes (same-SF SIR) [8]. To allow for a fair comparison between conventional single-user LoRa receivers and our proposed two-user receiver, we here seek to better model the performance of a single-user soft-detector in the presence of a single same-SF interferer.…”
Section: ) Threshold-based Single-user Receivermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the demodulation of LoRa symbols is inherently resistant against interference from packets using different spreading factors. A LoRa receiver benefits on average from a co-channel rejection of −16 dB for inter-SF interference [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The two protocols implemented were: LoRaWAN Class A in single channel and RTS-LoRa in single channel. Regarding the LoRa physical layer, two distinct models are assumed: destructive collisions, when two or more packets transmitted simultaneously are always considered lost, and a probabilistic model obtained from real measurements, allowing the reception of one packet in the event of concurrent transmissions depending on the ratio of RSSI values between the colliding packets [14]. The destructive model, although proved to be unrealistic, is still considered in the evaluation process given its importance in the literature.…”
Section: Evaluation Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LoRa communication technology is an unlicensed internet of things (IoT) technology that is characterized by low bandwidth, a limited number of messages, low power requirements, long-range communication, and higher penetration power [1]- [3]. The physical layer of the LoRa employs a chirp spread spectrum (CSS) modulation which enables long-range communication [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%