2003
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.310237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Receiver Pays Principle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
88
0
5

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
88
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…As a consequence, the choice of termination charge is not neutral. See Jeon, et al (2001) for more detail. (Wong, 1998).…”
Section: Getting Both Sides On Boardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence, the choice of termination charge is not neutral. See Jeon, et al (2001) for more detail. (Wong, 1998).…”
Section: Getting Both Sides On Boardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper we have shown that the stark prediction in Jeon et al (2004) of a strategic connectivity breakdown under RPP (receiving party pays, i.e. subscribers also pay for receiving calls) and discrimination between on-and o¤-net prices does not hold up once more than two networks are considered in the model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For our purposes we need to extend our theoretical model in all three directions simultaneously. The general model will be constructed as follows: (i) to consider an arbitrary number of networks and imperfect competition we will use the Logit model, (ii) to introduce asymmetries in market shares we will allow for a brand loyalty parameter (as in Wright [1999, 2003]), (iii) …nally, we will introduce call externality by assuming that receivers obtain utility from receiving a call, as in Jeon et al (2004), Berger (2004Berger ( , 2005, and López (2011).…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%