1996
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/279.4.1380
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the reflection effect in three sdOB binary stars

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
80
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
80
2
Order By: Relevance
“…4 of Rauch & Werner (2003) is incorrect. In its top panel, the data of Hilditch et al (1996) is erroneously shown with an offset of +0.5 d, and the v rad values in the bottom panel have an incorrect sign. This explains the period deviation that was previously found (Sect.…”
Section: Orbital Periodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 of Rauch & Werner (2003) is incorrect. In its top panel, the data of Hilditch et al (1996) is erroneously shown with an offset of +0.5 d, and the v rad values in the bottom panel have an incorrect sign. This explains the period deviation that was previously found (Sect.…”
Section: Orbital Periodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) are largely dominated by reflection effects, and resembles its optical light curves (Hilditch et al 1996). The amplitude of the reflection effect at NIR is ΔH ∼ 0.7 mag against 0.55 mag in the V band.…”
Section: Kv Velmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…As stated by Landolt & Drilling (1986) and later by Hilditch et al (1996), modeling of infrared light curves of this binary would be key to our understanding of its properties and of others of its kind, setting our motivation for this analysis.…”
Section: Kv Velmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations