2008
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/108/1/012008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the relations among the pseudogap, electronic charge order and Fermi-arc superconductivity in Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a behavior, as they indicated, might be related to the existence of commensurate and incommensurate CDW gaps in a close analogy with the case of dichalcogenides [210]. Moreover, photoemission studies of La 1.875 Ba 0.125 CuO 4 have shown [211] that there seems to be two different pseudogaps: (i) a d-wave-like pseudogap, which is a precursor to superconductivity, near the node of the truly superconducting gap; and (ii) a pseudogap, which became more or less familiar to the community during last years [96,107,187,[203][204][205][206] and is identified by us as the CDW gap, in the antinodal momentum region. In Reference [212], it was found by ARPES that actually it may be three distinct energy scales, corresponding to pseudogap, fluctuating superconductivity onset and coherence onset temperatures.…”
Section: Cdw and Pseudogap Evidence In Cupratesmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such a behavior, as they indicated, might be related to the existence of commensurate and incommensurate CDW gaps in a close analogy with the case of dichalcogenides [210]. Moreover, photoemission studies of La 1.875 Ba 0.125 CuO 4 have shown [211] that there seems to be two different pseudogaps: (i) a d-wave-like pseudogap, which is a precursor to superconductivity, near the node of the truly superconducting gap; and (ii) a pseudogap, which became more or less familiar to the community during last years [96,107,187,[203][204][205][206] and is identified by us as the CDW gap, in the antinodal momentum region. In Reference [212], it was found by ARPES that actually it may be three distinct energy scales, corresponding to pseudogap, fluctuating superconductivity onset and coherence onset temperatures.…”
Section: Cdw and Pseudogap Evidence In Cupratesmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…By doing this we rely not only on direct observations of CDWs in the real r-space but also on the identification of mysterious pseudogaps (the energy gaps of a still ambiguous nature both below and above the critical temperature, T c ) often observed in high-T c ceramics [100,101,[106][107][108][109][110][111][112] with the CDW gaps. We emphasize that the observed coherent long-range phenomena occur against a non-homogeneous background of the intrinsically non-stoichiometric materials [113][114][115][116][117][118].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33) Therefore, the d-wave superconducting gap is restricted to opening mainly on the Fermi arc and the gap amplitude reaches a maximum at the arc edge. Thus, the "effective" gap, ∆ S G (hereafter, ∆ S G means the "effective" gap value), is given by ∆ S G ∝ L a ∆ 0 , 34) where L a is the length of the Fermi arc. Since L a shrinks with decreasing doping, 35) ∆ S G may decrease, as has been pointed out by Oda et al 34) This fact explains the increase in ξ ab with decreasing doping.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some essential results have been obtained quite recently, e.g. the coexistence of the pseudogap (PG) and of the superconducting gap (SCG) with the own energy scales at fixed doping [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. The extraction of a true SCG from the background becomes possible [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extraction of a true SCG from the background becomes possible [11,12]. The presence of the Fermi surface (FS) fragments in the form of arcs at underdoping [5,8,10,13] has been controlled by measuring the Shubnikov-de Haas oscillations [14][15][16]. The distinct reveal of the two SCG in cuprates succeed in [6] which was expected for long.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%