2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.topol.2018.11.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the relationship between ideal cluster points and ideal limit points

Abstract: Let X be a first countable space which admits a non-trivial convergent sequence and let I be an analytic P-ideal. First, it is shown that the sets of I-limit points of all sequences in X are closed if and only if I is also an Fσ-ideal.Moreover, let (xn) be a sequence taking values in a Polish space without isolated points. It is known that the set A of its statistical limit points is an Fσ-set, the set B of its statistical cluster points is closed, and that the set C of its ordinary limit points is closed, wit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We refer the reader to [26] for characterizations of I-cluster points and [2] for their relation with I-limit points. Lastly, we recall that the sequence x is said to be I-convergent to ∈ X, shortened as…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We refer the reader to [26] for characterizations of I-cluster points and [2] for their relation with I-limit points. Lastly, we recall that the sequence x is said to be I-convergent to ∈ X, shortened as…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, Γ x (I) is compact for all real bounded sequences x, cf. [2,13,14] for basic facts and characterizations of I-cluster points.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The statistical versions of the result appeared in Theorem 1.1 [27] for real sequences, in Theorem 2.6 [28] in topological spaces and then in Theorem 2 [25] from where the statement has been reproduced. Later with a different line of proof it appeared in Theorem 3.1 [29] for metric spaces and in Theorem 2.2 [30] (topological spaces). The converse of the above result was established in Theorem 3 [25] but there was a gap in the argument which was later modified and is given a little later.…”
Section: Theorem 4 ([21]mentioning
confidence: 99%