2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2015.05.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the relationships among wheel–rail surface topography, interface noise and tribological transitions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, very few systematic investigations concentrating on the rolling-sliding wear and damage characteristics on the wheel/rail materials after machining can be available, which means that the effect of surface integrity of the machined wheel/rail materials on adhesion coefficient, wear and surface damage lacks sufficient systematic investigations. Existing studies pertaining to the surface integrity of wheel/rail interface have primarily centered on railway environmental noise [21][22][23]. In fact, surface integrity of the machined workpiece plays a crucial role in affecting the tribological performance during the rolling-sliding process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, very few systematic investigations concentrating on the rolling-sliding wear and damage characteristics on the wheel/rail materials after machining can be available, which means that the effect of surface integrity of the machined wheel/rail materials on adhesion coefficient, wear and surface damage lacks sufficient systematic investigations. Existing studies pertaining to the surface integrity of wheel/rail interface have primarily centered on railway environmental noise [21][22][23]. In fact, surface integrity of the machined workpiece plays a crucial role in affecting the tribological performance during the rolling-sliding process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the surface finish of the pins was kept constant for all tests, the rough surface value for all pin tests was about 0.09 μm. This range of the surface roughness is reported by many studies on the wheel rail contact [5,6,13]. The surface roughness was measured using a TAYLOR HOSON SURFTRONIC 25 profilometer.…”
Section: Samples Preparationmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…However, Lyu et al predicted that surface topographies can be completely changed after grinding operations. Then, using a pure sliding with pin-on-disc configuration, they revealed that surface topographies would result in wear, friction coefficient and noise tension [5]. In the case of wheel−rail contact, the main cause of wear is sliding [5−7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If no sound is generated from the contact, there is a lower probability that sound will be emitted. 8,9 The coefficient of friction measured for the cast iron material is high and reaches a value of 0.6. However, this is in agreement with previously reported values obtained in material testing of train wheels and rail materials 12 and also in full-scale coefficient of friction measurements of rail tack.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%