On the relevance of Bell’s probabilistic model for spin correlations

General commentary: Is the moon there if nobody looks—Bell inequalities and physical reality

“…Kupcynski's blunder arises from a literal interpretation of different equivalent mathematical expressions, one of which has a direct physical meaning, while the other, obtained after correct mathematical transformations, does not. Curiously, such confusion, which first appeared in 1972 [2], persists to this day [3]. References [4,5] explain similar inconsistencies arising from joint probabilities and incompatibility.…”