2022
DOI: 10.1007/s40617-021-00665-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Reliability and Treatment Utility of the Practical Functional Assessment Process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 62 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is possible that the inclusion of ecologically relevant synthesized reinforcers or the use of a variable, unpredictable schedule of reinforcement (or both) may have contributed to the efficacy of schedule thinning without supplemental procedures. Other studies evaluating skill-based treatment have reported large reductions in challenging behavior without the use of supplemental procedures as well (e.g., Fiani & Jessel, 2022;Jessel et al, 2018;Rajaraman, Hanley, Gover, Ruppel, et al, 2022;Rajaraman, Hanley, Gover, Staubitz, et al, 2022;Staubitz et al, 2022). However, the success of FCT without supplemental procedures has also been reported in large-n consecutive controlled case studies with a variety of other schedule-thinning methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible that the inclusion of ecologically relevant synthesized reinforcers or the use of a variable, unpredictable schedule of reinforcement (or both) may have contributed to the efficacy of schedule thinning without supplemental procedures. Other studies evaluating skill-based treatment have reported large reductions in challenging behavior without the use of supplemental procedures as well (e.g., Fiani & Jessel, 2022;Jessel et al, 2018;Rajaraman, Hanley, Gover, Ruppel, et al, 2022;Rajaraman, Hanley, Gover, Staubitz, et al, 2022;Staubitz et al, 2022). However, the success of FCT without supplemental procedures has also been reported in large-n consecutive controlled case studies with a variety of other schedule-thinning methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%