1991
DOI: 10.1016/0304-3975(51)90007-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the representation and querying of sets of possible worlds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
140
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 184 publications
(140 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
140
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since we know how to construct canonical solutions and cores [10,11,24,13], the problem of answering queries in data exchange is thus reduced to the classical and well studied problem of answering queries in databases with incomplete information [2,3,17].…”
Section: Query Answering: Semanticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Since we know how to construct canonical solutions and cores [10,11,24,13], the problem of answering queries in data exchange is thus reduced to the classical and well studied problem of answering queries in databases with incomplete information [2,3,17].…”
Section: Query Answering: Semanticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Semantics data complexity certain 2 coNP-complete certain 3 coNP-complete maybe 2 NP-complete maybe 3 NP-complete The data complexity of FO queries for the semantics certain 2 , certain 3 , maybe 2 , and maybe 3 is as shown in Figure 2.…”
Section: Query Answering: Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To this end, we define approximations of possible answers and two matching-based semijoin operators. There already exists a notion of maybeanswers [2,31] -answers that appear in Q v(D) for at least one valuation v -but those can be infinite, and include arbitrary elements outside of adom(D). What we need instead is a compact representation.…”
Section: An Implementation-friendly Translationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason is that SQL's designers had first and foremost efficient evaluation in mind, but correctness and efficiency do not always get along. Computing certain answers is CONP-hard for most reasonable semantics, if we deal with relational calculus/algebra queries [2]. On the other hand, SQL evaluation is very efficient; it is in AC 0 (a small parallel complexity class) for the same class of queries, and so it provably cannot compute certain answers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%