Proceedings of 32nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control
DOI: 10.1109/cdc.1993.325484
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the representation of sensor faults in fault detection filters

Abstract: This paper presents an extension of the wellknown Beard-Jones detection filter that permits isolation of sensor faults in a dynamic system to a fixed direction in output space. The method is based on augmenting the system equations by an auxiliary state to represent the dynamic behavior of the sensor fault, and in effect converts the sensor fault into the same form as an actuator 'fault. The only condition required is observability of the original system.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As has been pointed out, making the state estimation error (19) independent of w(t) requires additional knowledge on the disturbance. One approach assumes a model of the disturbance's dynamics and extends the system state [11]. The enhanced system state contains w(t) as a combination of k additional states x w (t) which are represented by a linear dynamic:…”
Section: Output Disturbance Observer Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As has been pointed out, making the state estimation error (19) independent of w(t) requires additional knowledge on the disturbance. One approach assumes a model of the disturbance's dynamics and extends the system state [11]. The enhanced system state contains w(t) as a combination of k additional states x w (t) which are represented by a linear dynamic:…”
Section: Output Disturbance Observer Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considerable work has been devoted to the design of unknown input observers (UIOs) [4][5][6][7][8][9] which converge despite the presence of disturbances in the system equation [10]. By modelling sensor errors in an extended system state [11], both uncertainties in system and measurement equation can be represented as unknown input signals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vector f contains both faults affecting the dynamics equation via E a; (process and actuator faults) and sensor faults influencing the measurements via E s; . Notice that, thereby, sensor faults are treated directly, and no reformulation as pseudo-actuator faults as in [25] is necessary. Hence, no dynamic extensions are needed to handle sensor faults, resulting in a reduced design and implementation effort compared with Park and Rizzoni [25].…”
Section: Problem Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notice that, thereby, sensor faults are treated directly, and no reformulation as pseudo-actuator faults as in [25] is necessary. Hence, no dynamic extensions are needed to handle sensor faults, resulting in a reduced design and implementation effort compared with Park and Rizzoni [25]. The matrices describing (3) are assumed to be subject to parametric uncertainties, that is, they are not known exactly.…”
Section: Problem Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notice that system formulation (1) is not restrictive: sensor faults can also be represented by actuator faults as indicated in [16].…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%