2019 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference Workshop (WCNCW) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/wcncw.2019.8902865
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Resource Utilization of Multi-Connectivity Transmission for URLLC Services in 5G New Radio

Abstract: Multi-connectivity with packet duplication, where the same data packet is duplicated and transmitted from multiple transmitters, is proposed in 5G New Radio as a reliability enhancement feature. This paper presents an analytical study of the outage probability enhancement with multi-connectivity, and analyses its cost in terms of resource usage. The performance analysis is further compared against conventional single-connectivity transmission. Our analysis shows that, for transmission with a given block error … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
25
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The processing time at the UE is denoted by T up . The frame alignment delay T fa is a random variable uniformly distributed between zero and one TTI [28]. Depending on the packet size, channel quality and scheduling strategy, the transmission time T tx can vary from one to multiple TTIs.…”
Section: Grant-free Access Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The processing time at the UE is denoted by T up . The frame alignment delay T fa is a random variable uniformly distributed between zero and one TTI [28]. Depending on the packet size, channel quality and scheduling strategy, the transmission time T tx can vary from one to multiple TTIs.…”
Section: Grant-free Access Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 depicts the resource usage performance gains of sending URLLC payloads, assuming in-resource control channel multiplexing with respect to outage probability targets ranging from P tar out = 10 −4 to P tar out = 10 −7 and for different channel conditions. We assume data and metadata size are D = 32 and M = 16 bytes, respectively [61], [77]. The gains are compared against the baseline scenario with a single transmission in which both data metadata are encoded with the same BLEP equal P d1 e = P m1 e = 1 2 P tar out .…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A new sub-codeword is consecutively transmitted if the UE fails to correctly decode previous received concatenated samples. The success probability following HARQ retransmission is obtained as [77] P I2a succ = (1 − P m1 e ) (1 − P na e ) (1 − P m2 e ) P d1 e − P d12 e ,…”
Section: A In-resource Control Signallingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Inefficiencies of DC-based data duplication with respect to physical-layer duplication have been also proven via measurement campaigns in industrial scenarios [24]. The observed negative impact of data duplication on system-level performance triggered the investigation of suitable system configurations [21], [25], dynamic link activation heuristics [26], and predictive flow control strategies [27], with the aim of achieving as wide as possible support of URLLC exploiting DC-based data duplication. Nevertheless, there is margin for further improvements of reliability-oriented DC in 5G cellular systems.…”
Section: Related Work and Novel Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 95%