2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.coldregions.2020.103041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the results of studying ice ridges in the Shokal'skogo Strait, part I: Morphology and physical parameters in-situ

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that OIB's observed modal snow thickness of 4 cm (mean 9 cm) agrees well with the expected accumulation between February and March from the Warren climatology (Warren et al, 1999). However, we also take into account that OIB Sea Ice Freeboard, Snow Depth, and Thickness Quick Look data most likely underestimate snow thickness on the order of 5-6 cm (King et al, 2015).…”
Section: Ice Thickness Measurementssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…We note that OIB's observed modal snow thickness of 4 cm (mean 9 cm) agrees well with the expected accumulation between February and March from the Warren climatology (Warren et al, 1999). However, we also take into account that OIB Sea Ice Freeboard, Snow Depth, and Thickness Quick Look data most likely underestimate snow thickness on the order of 5-6 cm (King et al, 2015).…”
Section: Ice Thickness Measurementssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Since ridge keels in Arctic seas have a more complicated morphology than floe edges (Bitz et al., 2001; Obert & Brown, 2011; Wadhams et al., 2011), C dw has a range of values corresponding to various keel shapes rather than being a constant. Using the simple triangular shape of ridge keel (Bonath et al., 2018; Ekeberg et al., 2015; Kharitonov & Borodkin, 2020), the slope angle αw and the keel depth h w define the keel geometry. The goal of this study is to investigate how C dw varies with the keel geometry, and a parameterization scheme of C dw = C dw (αw, h w ) with its range of variation is presented, allowing an improved formulation of the ice‐ocean drag coefficient in Equation .…”
Section: Parameterization Of the Ice‐ocean Drag Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 99%