1984
DOI: 10.1016/0301-0104(84)85059-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the role of 3d orbitals in sulfur

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…included. However, such effects on CS bonds do not appear to markedly longer than in the singlet-thiohydroxymethylenes and be as large as those found in the case of the SO bonds (40).…”
Section: Structuresmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…included. However, such effects on CS bonds do not appear to markedly longer than in the singlet-thiohydroxymethylenes and be as large as those found in the case of the SO bonds (40).…”
Section: Structuresmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Our first guess was that the additional d function (exponent 0.014204) enhances the representation of the 3d orbital of sulfur. The latter is known to participate actively in the bonding of hypervalent sulfur 33 and might be important in the excited states, too. However, additional test calculations showed that the considerable red shift is brought about mainly by the diffuse p function (exponent 0.009988).…”
Section: Ground State Geometry and Vertical Transition Energiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of achieving a proper polarization of the central atom was investigated by using two different polarized split-valence bases, which include two sets of d functions on S. These bases were constructed from the standard 6-3 lG* one, by replacing the standard set of d functions on sulfur by two sets of exponents, 0.39 and 1.18 in one case (22), and 0.30 and 0.80 in the other (14). Energies obtained with the first set of exponents were systematically lower than those obtained with the second; we shall therefore discuss exclusively the results obtained with the former basis, which will be denoted as 6-31G*+d,.…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the concrete aspects of the SCF ab initio treatment of sulfamide, it is worth noticing that the choice of the basis set, which constitutes one of the most crucial problems of any ab initio calculation, becomes particularly relevant in the present case, where the second-row atom displays a hypervalent coordination (7,(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17). Moreover, the high electronegativity of the ligands bonded to sulfur in this system will likely render polarization effects quite important, so that a proper description of the polarization of the first-row atoms would also be unavoidable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%