2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.04.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the role of key players in rural social innovation processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings on farmers' insecurity and partners' relationships confirm propositions of Richter and Christmann (2021): key players are needed for dealing with internal opposition and overcoming external hurdles. These elements argue for the implementation of intermediation between stakeholders in agricultural extension to promote better risk management (Bertolozzi-Caredio et al, 2021) and farmers' role transitions (Hauser et al, 2016).…”
Section: Adaptive Governance With Stakeholderssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Our findings on farmers' insecurity and partners' relationships confirm propositions of Richter and Christmann (2021): key players are needed for dealing with internal opposition and overcoming external hurdles. These elements argue for the implementation of intermediation between stakeholders in agricultural extension to promote better risk management (Bertolozzi-Caredio et al, 2021) and farmers' role transitions (Hauser et al, 2016).…”
Section: Adaptive Governance With Stakeholderssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Moreover, the average number of participations per entity is positively related to the regional average degree in the regional network as well as with the proportion of regional entities connected among them (connectivity). Thus, bigger participants contribute to a better integrated regional innovation system; therefore, large participants are key players who act as intermediaries between communities and supra-regional networks, as has already been demonstrated by previous works [61,62].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Such drivers may, for instance, be smart villagers (Zerrer and Sept, 2020), diverse communities (Müller and Ibert, 2015;Brinks, 2016;Lombardi et al, 2020;Martinus, 2022), social entrepreneurs (Richter et al, 2020), or government agents (Mascarenhas et al, 2020;Wolf et al, 2021). These social actors do not necessarily regard themselves as innovators, but nevertheless generate innovations, sometimes, for example, in the form of social innovations (Domanski et al, 2020;Richter and Christmann, 2021) Thirdly, recent studies on the time-spatial dimensions of innovation processes reveal the multi-local nature of such processes (Schmidt et al, 2018). Multiple actors are engaged in finding novel solutions to practical problems at different sites, in different organisations and in different social settings.…”
Section: Time-spatial Dynamics Of Innovation Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such drivers may, for instance, be smart villagers (Zerrer and Sept, 2020), diverse communities (Müller and Ibert, 2015; Brinks, 2016; Lombardi et al, 2020; Martinus, 2022), social entrepreneurs (Richter et al, 2020), or government agents (Mascarenhas et al, 2020; Wolf et al, 2021). These social actors do not necessarily regard themselves as innovators, but nevertheless generate innovations, sometimes, for example, in the form of social innovations (Domanski et al, 2020; Richter and Christmann, 2021)…”
Section: Challenging Dialogical Knowledge Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%