“…(5, 63), (9, 9), (10,6), (11,5), (16,3), (24, 2) M 12 (10,9), (11,9), (15,5), (16,4), (20, 3), (22, 2), (29, 2), (30, 2), (32, 2), (34, 2) 2.M 12 (6, 66), (10,9), (12,8) 4, it remains to consider the faithful irreducible F r G-modules with r R, for each pair (d, R) given in the second column. As explained in the proof of the proposition, R is simply the largest integer such that f (G, d, R) < 1/2, so several values of r R are readily ruled out either because (i) they are not prime powers, (ii) the d-dimensional representation in question is not actually realised over F r (as one may verify using either the relevant character table in GAP [4,12] or by referring to Hiss and Malle [15]), or (iii) the representation is realised but b(GV ) = 2, i.e.…”