Proceedings of the 3rd ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking &Amp; Computing 2002
DOI: 10.1145/513800.513822
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the scalability of IEEE 802.11 ad hoc networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By using the DCF mechanism, enabling the features of PSM is difficult, because it does not contain an access point. Nodes in the PS mode are expected to synchronize among themselves in a distributed way (Huang and Lai, 2002;Tseng et al, 2003). In ad-hoc environment, source should inform by giving an advertisement through ATIM during the packet Advertisement period (ATIM window).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By using the DCF mechanism, enabling the features of PSM is difficult, because it does not contain an access point. Nodes in the PS mode are expected to synchronize among themselves in a distributed way (Huang and Lai, 2002;Tseng et al, 2003). In ad-hoc environment, source should inform by giving an advertisement through ATIM during the packet Advertisement period (ATIM window).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we note that accurate frame synchronization acquisition is only required for the interaction between neighboring nodes. A number of synchronization mechanisms have been proposed and studied for the operation in a multi-hop network environment (e.g., [30][31][32]). The time unit of the super frame is of a much larger time scale than that of a packet transmission time, while CSMA/CA is used in our simulation as the underlying MAC protocol for packet transmissions.…”
Section: Appendix: the Mbn-ps Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, IEEE 802.11, the de facto standard for WLAN technology, was originally designed without inherent support for QoS required by multimedia services such as VoIP. Problems such as unpredictable delay jitters due to random contention, bursty packet losses due to wireless interference and user mobility, poor scalability, and lack of security have been identified and under investigation by many research endeavors [1][2][3][4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%