1987
DOI: 10.1017/s0001867800017511
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the scheduling of alternative stochastic jobs on a single machine

Abstract: Standard models in stochastic resource allocation concern the economic processing of all jobs in some set J. We consider a set up in which tasks in various subsets of J are deemed to be alternative to one another, in that only one member of such a subset of alternative tasks will be completed during the evolution of the process. Existing stochastic scheduling methodology for single-machine problems is developed and extended to this novel class of models. A major area of application is in research planning.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From Theorem 1 of Glazebrook and Fay (1987), a result for the independence case, we deduce from (6) and 7that…”
Section: Optimal Policies For Two-job Problemsmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…From Theorem 1 of Glazebrook and Fay (1987), a result for the independence case, we deduce from (6) and 7that…”
Section: Optimal Policies For Two-job Problemsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Here a (discounted) reward R, is earned upon the jth job completion, j = 1, 2. For examples of-such models, see Glazebrook and Fay (1987). In (2) E:J( is an expectation conditional upon the application of policy n: Note that we shall introduce job-specific reward models in Section 4.…”
Section: A Class Of Two-job Single-machine Stochastic Scheduling Probmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We now apply the theory of Section 2 to a model first discussed by Glazebrook and Fay (1987). In this example of MDPs in parallel, each constituent MDP may be thought of as an R&D project with two phases.…”
Section: Scheduling Alternative Stochastic Tasksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Section 2 we give more explicit expression to the ideas described here and then proceed to give an upper bound for the loss in total expected reward incurred when making the above reduction. These results are applied in Sections 3 and 4 to two classes of decision processes previously discussed by Glazebrook (1979) and Glazebrook and Fay (1987) respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%