2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00366-020-01096-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the seismic collapse capacity of optimally designed steel braced frames

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ruggieri et al [12] developed a method for prioritising seismic risks in RC school buildings, and Zareian and Krawinkler [13] presented a probabilistic method for estimating the collapse potential of structural systems. Gholizadeh et al [14] investigated the collapse capacity of steel concentric braced frames, Li et al [15] used a stochastic dynamic analysis framework to understand the collapse risk of high-rise reinforced concrete structures.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ruggieri et al [12] developed a method for prioritising seismic risks in RC school buildings, and Zareian and Krawinkler [13] presented a probabilistic method for estimating the collapse potential of structural systems. Gholizadeh et al [14] investigated the collapse capacity of steel concentric braced frames, Li et al [15] used a stochastic dynamic analysis framework to understand the collapse risk of high-rise reinforced concrete structures.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ECBO was then proposed to improve the drawbacks of colliding bodies optimization. Gholizadeh and Milany slightly modified ECBO and proposed ECBO‐II algorithm, which is described below.…”
Section: Optimization Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, metaheuristic optimization algorithms are utilized in conjunction with an NN model to minimize the total cost of SMRFs in the framework of PBD. Gholizadeh and Milany compared the performance of particle swarm optimization (PSO), dolphin echolocation optimization (DEO), enhanced colliding bodies optimization (ECBO), and ECBO‐II in PBD optimization of SMRFs considering the initial cost. Their study demonstrated superiority of ECBO‐II metaheuristic over the other algorithms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimization methods can be implemented along with performance‐based approaches for designing cost‐effective structural systems 19 . Metaheuristic algorithms have emerged as powerful tools for optimizing structural systems in a performance‐based design context 20–23 . Many studies have focused on finding optimal structural cross‐sections, but only a few have incorporated connection and structural costs 24 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 Metaheuristic algorithms have emerged as powerful tools for optimizing structural systems in a performance-based design context. [20][21][22][23] Many studies have focused on finding optimal structural cross-sections, but only a few have incorporated connection and structural costs. 24 Topology optimization methodologies have been implemented to find the best arrangement of moment connections in MRFs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%