1983
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-50171-1_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the semantics of rule-based expert systems with uncertainty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We model an observer's background knowledge (BK obs ) as a set of probabilistic first-order Datalog (pDatalog) clauses [25]. pDatalog is much more expressive than propositional logic variations usually used in inference control on statistical databases [30] in that it allows us to model relationships among attributes as well as relationships between attributes and time.…”
Section: Background Knowledge Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We model an observer's background knowledge (BK obs ) as a set of probabilistic first-order Datalog (pDatalog) clauses [25]. pDatalog is much more expressive than propositional logic variations usually used in inference control on statistical databases [30] in that it allows us to model relationships among attributes as well as relationships between attributes and time.…”
Section: Background Knowledge Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time complexity of this first step is polynomial because we make the following assumptions on the background knowledge model. We assume that uncertainty functions (f ) adhere to the "natural restrictions" [25] of monotonicity (f (…”
Section: A Simulated Annealing Based Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, practical considerations dictate that the framework used for knowledge representation with uncertainty admit efficient implementation and efficient computations. Logic database programming, with its advantage of modularity and its powerful top-down and bottom-up query processing techniques, has attracted the attention of researchers and numerous frameworks for deductive databases with uncertainty have been proposed [2, 4, 5, 9, 10, 14-16, 18-22, 25-27, 35-39], where the underlying uncertainty formalism include probability theory [10,19,22,[25][26][27]39], fuzzy set theory [2,35,37,38], multi-valued logic [9,15,16,20,21] and possibilistic logic [5]. Roughly, based on the way in which uncertainty is associated with the facts and rules of a program, these frameworks can be classified into annotation based (AB) and implication based (IB).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem of uncertainty management in logic programs has attracted the attention of many researchers and numerous frameworks have been proposed [1-3, 6, 8-11, 13-17]. Each of them addresses the management of different kind of uncertainty: (i) probability theory [6,10,[13][14][15]; (ii) fuzzy set theory [1,16,17]; (iii) multi-valued logic [8,9,11]; and (iv) possibilistic logic [3]. Apart from the different notion of uncertainty they rely on, these frameworks differ in the way in which uncertainty is associated with the facts and rules of a program.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here f is an n-ary computable function and β i is either a constant or a variable ranging over an appropriate certainty domain. Examples of AB frameworks include [8,9,14,15]. In the IB approach, a rule is of the form A α ← B 1 , ..., B n , which says that the certainty associated with the implication B 1 ∧ ... ∧ B n → A is α. Computationally, given an assignment v of certainties to the B i s, the certainty of A is computed by taking the "conjunction" of the certainties v(B i ) and then somehow "propagating" it to the rule head.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%