Proceedings of the 1993 ACM SIGMETRICS Conference on Measurement and Modeling of Computer Systems 1993
DOI: 10.1145/166955.166998
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the sensitivity of transient solutions of Markov models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sensitivity analysis of the aforementioned measures to changes in the parameters may reveal performance or reliability bottlenecks and help designers in achieving desired performance measures and robustness values. Formally, the gradients ∇ θ ER, ∇ θ EY or ∇ θ MTFF are the solutions of the equations arising after taking derivatives of both sides of (1), (3) and (4), respectively [2]. Sensitivities of the performance measures to the individual parameters θ[i] are the components of the gradient vectors.…”
Section: B Analysis Tasksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensitivity analysis of the aforementioned measures to changes in the parameters may reveal performance or reliability bottlenecks and help designers in achieving desired performance measures and robustness values. Formally, the gradients ∇ θ ER, ∇ θ EY or ∇ θ MTFF are the solutions of the equations arising after taking derivatives of both sides of (1), (3) and (4), respectively [2]. Sensitivities of the performance measures to the individual parameters θ[i] are the components of the gradient vectors.…”
Section: B Analysis Tasksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While intrusive epistemic uncertainty propagation can be easily performed through aleatory models with simulative solutions, 2 they are harder to perform through analytic aleatory models. Perturbation methods, which formulate and solve a version of the original model with the model parameters incorporating the epistemic uncertainty, are examples of intrusive methods of epistemic uncertainty propagation through analytic aleatory models [65]. On the other hand, non-intrusive methods use repeated solutions of the existing model with different parameter values.…”
Section: Epistemic Uncertainty Propagationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…al. derive analytic bounds for model output for variations (perturbations) in value of a single parameter or values of multiple parameters [65] for Markov reliability models, with the help of differential equations based on the transient solution of state probabilities (obtained by solving the Kolmogorov differential equations) [86].…”
Section: E[r(t)] ≈ R(t)|mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Namely, the (i, j) entry of exp(Qt) is the probability that the chain is at state j at time t if it is at state i initially. The sensitivity of the transition matrix has been studied in [12] and it is proved that in the ∞-norm, ν(Q, t) = t Q ∞ , demonstrating benign perturbation properties for this problem. In Markov chains, however, one is often more interested in smaller entries of exp(Qt), which represent small probability events.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%