2008
DOI: 10.1109/taes.2008.4517016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the sequential track correlation algorithm in a multisensor data fusion system

Abstract: This note points out that the recently published sequential track correlation algorithm overlooked the correlation in time of the state estimation errors.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of them is track correlation mass and the other one is track separation mass. Similar to the association mass (La Scala and Farina, 2002;Bar-Shalom, 2008), the track correlation mass m ii (l) denotes the times of track i from node 1 correlated with track j from node 2 till time l and the separation mass of track i and j is defined as follow Equation (19):…”
Section: Track Mass Designingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One of them is track correlation mass and the other one is track separation mass. Similar to the association mass (La Scala and Farina, 2002;Bar-Shalom, 2008), the track correlation mass m ii (l) denotes the times of track i from node 1 correlated with track j from node 2 till time l and the separation mass of track i and j is defined as follow Equation (19):…”
Section: Track Mass Designingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Track-to-trackassociatio n problem (You et al, 1996;Singer and Kanyuck, 1971;Bar-Shalom and Fortmann, 1988;Gul, 1994;Kosoka, 1983;You et al, 1989;Bowman, 1979;Chang and Youens, 1982;Bar-Shalom and Chen, 2004;Kaplan et al, 2008;Tian and BarShalom, 2011;Bar-Shalom and Campo, 1986;Mori et al, 2011;Osbome et al, 2011;Wang et al, 2012;La Scala and Farina, 2002; Bar-Shalom, 2008) is a crux of distributed multisensor system. It's a problem of how to decide whether two tracks coming from different sensor systems represent the same target.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In traditional MF, data association is tipically performed at first to provide measurement-to-object correspondence, then a bank of independent Kalman filters, one for each object, are used to estimate the object states. Track-to-track fusion (T2TF) [15] is adopted to associate object tracks of different agents so that the asoociated tracks can then be combined according to either optimal fusion [16], [17], [18], if the cross-correlations among different agents are known, or otherwise covariance intersection [19], [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many algorithms have been proposed to solve the track-to-track association problem, such as Singer's algorithm [6,7], Bar-Shalom's algorithm [8,9], Sequential Algorithm [10,11], assignment algorithm [12], likelihood ratio test algorithm [13], multiple hypothesis test algorithm [14], and so on. The current track-to-track association algorithms have good performance in the ideal simulation environments, but when using in practical application it is often encountered that the probability of track correct correlation seriously falls and the probability of track false correlation and missing correlation greatly rise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%