2019
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1911.02699
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Serrin-type condition on one velocity component for the Navier-Stokes equations

Abstract: In this paper we consider the regularity problem of the Navier-Stokes equations in R 3 . We show that the Serrin-type condition imposed on one component of the velocity u 3 ∈ L p (0, T ; L q (R 3 )) for with 2 p + 3 q < 1, 3 < q ≤ +∞ implies the regularity of the weak Leray solution u : R 3 × (0, T ) → R 3 with the initial data belonging to L 2 (R 2 ) ∩ L 3 (R 3 ). The result is an immediate consequence of a new local regularity criterion in terms of one velocity component for suitable weak solutions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Remark 1.2. Theorem 1.1 is a direct consequence of Theorem 1.3 and Remark 1.4 via a similar compactness argument in [4]. Moreover, the initial data u 0 ∈ L 2 (R 3 ) ∩ L 3 (R 3 ) implies the local-in-time regularity of weak solution, thus the weak solution is actually suitable weak solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Remark 1.2. Theorem 1.1 is a direct consequence of Theorem 1.3 and Remark 1.4 via a similar compactness argument in [4]. Moreover, the initial data u 0 ∈ L 2 (R 3 ) ∩ L 3 (R 3 ) implies the local-in-time regularity of weak solution, thus the weak solution is actually suitable weak solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…We also shall use the same notation as that in Chae-Wolf [4]. For x = (x 1 , x 2 , x 3 ) ∈ R 3 , we denote x ′ = (x 1 , x 2 ) the horizontal variable.…”
Section: Notations and Preliminarymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In fact in that case M ≤ C( u L ∞ ((0,T );L ∞ ) , u 0 H 5 , u 0 W 5,∞ ), which can be shown by an iteration (with respect to the order of the derivatives) of Gronwall inequalities (see [11] or [32,Theorem 7.1] for details). There are a number of well-known sufficient conditions that guarantee that a given Leray weak solution is in fact strong [7,10,21,24,27,29,32,33,34,39]. One of them is the Ladyzhenskaya-Prodi-Serrin [24,29,33] condition, u ∈ L p ((0, T ); L q (R 3 )), where p ∈ [2, ∞), q ∈ (3, ∞] are such that…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%