1993
DOI: 10.2140/pjm.1993.160.53
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the shape of fundamental domains in GL(n,R)O(n)

Abstract: We investigate parameters for the symmetric space H = G/K, G = GL{n, R), K = O(n), in the sense of positive definite quadratic forms. This leads to a description for the fundamental domain H/T where Γ is an arithmetic subgroup of G. We also see interesting relations with the Siegel sets. This enables us to explicitly describe Satake compactifcations of H/T. We will also consider the behavior at the "bottom" of the fundamental domains.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We must now compute F rk=1,2 de f E 6 with respect to unfolded fundamental domains F rk=1,2 . The SL(3) fundamental domain F is known [33,34], a complete description is given in Appendix B.2, see in particular equations (B.17) and (B.19). Its construction is in terms of a height function given by the maximal abelian torus coordinate L 3 in (4.2) along with the actions of an (overcomplete) set of SL(3, Z) generators S 1,...,5 , T 1,2 and U 1,2 given in (B.16,B.18).…”
Section: Rank 1 and 2 Winding Modesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We must now compute F rk=1,2 de f E 6 with respect to unfolded fundamental domains F rk=1,2 . The SL(3) fundamental domain F is known [33,34], a complete description is given in Appendix B.2, see in particular equations (B.17) and (B.19). Its construction is in terms of a height function given by the maximal abelian torus coordinate L 3 in (4.2) along with the actions of an (overcomplete) set of SL(3, Z) generators S 1,...,5 , T 1,2 and U 1,2 given in (B.16,B.18).…”
Section: Rank 1 and 2 Winding Modesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that our bound is stronger than the result for SL 3 (Z) from [Mi96] where it was proved that λ 1 ≥ 1. In general, our method applies to G = SL n (R) with Γ = SL n (Z) to give the bound λ 1 > 3π 2 /M where M is the number of fundamental domains which intersect a Siegel set containing the fundamental domain constructed in [Gr93]; however, for n ≥ 4, this bound is rather weak. Finally, let us remark that our theorem is indeed a consequence of the Ramanujan conjecture, which asserts that all nontrivial automorphic representations come from tempered representations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, we introduce a fundamental domain for Γ\H. Specifically, computations on page 56 of [Gr93] show that a fundamental domain D is described through the following set of inequalities:…”
Section: §1 Statement Of the Main Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The trivial V 3 dependence ofF L is always implicit 9. This simply follows from the structure of divergences of the Mercedes diagrams[22] which arise from the boundary of the fundamental domain of SL(3, Z)[38][39][40]. Our auxiliary geometry is a subspace of the T 3 geometry with the same boundary structure 10.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%