1970
DOI: 10.1017/s0004972700046074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the sharpness of a limiting case of the Sobolev imbedding theorem

Abstract: A refinement of the Sobolev imbedding theorem, due to Trudinger, is shown to be optimal in a natural sense.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We may choose the class of Lebesgue spaces. In this context, for inequality (1) the space L q (Ω) with q := np/(n − p) is the optimal range space given the fixed domain space L p (Ω), 1 < p < n. In the class of Orlicz spaces, the space L ϕ (Ω) with ϕ(t) = exp(t n ) − 1 and n := n/(n − 1) is the optimal range space for the fixed domain space L n (Ω) (see [11]). The optimal range problem within the class of Orlicz spaces has been studied by Cianchi [4].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We may choose the class of Lebesgue spaces. In this context, for inequality (1) the space L q (Ω) with q := np/(n − p) is the optimal range space given the fixed domain space L p (Ω), 1 < p < n. In the class of Orlicz spaces, the space L ϕ (Ω) with ϕ(t) = exp(t n ) − 1 and n := n/(n − 1) is the optimal range space for the fixed domain space L n (Ω) (see [11]). The optimal range problem within the class of Orlicz spaces has been studied by Cianchi [4].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, neither of the target spaces can be replaced by an essentially smaller Orlicz space. This fact was observed by Hempel, Morris and Trudinger [9] for (1.2); a general result was later obtained by Cianchi [5]. However, both of the target spaces can be improved if we are willing to allow different function spaces than Orlicz spaces.…”
Section: Prologuementioning
confidence: 61%
“…Theorems 1 and 2 are related to a question raised in Hempel-MorrisTrudinger [4]. Our approach in proving Theorem 1 is to look for critical points of the functional Φ{u) = \j$\Vu\ 2 on the surface S μ = [u e H&Q) I / Q .F(JC, w) = μ}.…”
Section: Mei-chi Shawmentioning
confidence: 99%